ANH PRESS RELEASE: Food Supplements
Directive deemed invalid
5 April 2005
Advocate General finds Food Supplements Directive invalid under
EU law. This is a remarkable victory for ANH and consumers of leading-edge
food supplements.
ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH SET TO WIN ITS LANDMARK CHALLENGE TO
THE EU FOOD SUPPLEMENTS DIRECTIVE
There was tremendous news today for the millions of people in Europe
who choose to use food supplements. Following a landmark challenge
in the European Courts of Justice (ECJ) brought by the Alliance
for Natural Health and Nutri-Link Ltd to the contentious Food Supplements
Directive, which effectively proposed to ban 75% of vitamin and
mineral forms, Advocate General Geelhoed, the senior adviser to
the ECJ, gave his Opinion in favour of the Alliance’s case.
What does this mean? That the chances of consumers being able to
continue using the natural food supplements they believe are beneficial
to their health are now greatly increased. There has been uproar
about the proposed EU ban, and maybe, against the odds, the consumer
is going to come out on top in what is a remarkable modern day case
of David and Goliath.
In a statement released in Luxembourg today at 0830 GMT, the Advocate
General concluded that:
* The Food Supplements Directive infringes the principle of proportionality
because basic principles of Community law, such as the requirements
of legal protection, of legal certainty and of sound administration
have not properly been taken into account.
* It is therefore invalid under EU law.
It should be stressed that the Advocate General’s pronouncement
is not a ruling. That will come from the ECJ judges, later - probably
around June. But typically, in the vast majority of cases, the Court
Judgment follows the recommendations of the Advocate General.
If the Advocate General’s recommendations are adopted, in
effect, the ban on vitamin and mineral forms not included on the
EU’s ‘Positive list,’ due to come into effect
on 1 August 2005, will be declared illegal. In essence, the positive
list of allowable nutrient forms will be deemed to be too narrow,
too restrictive, and based on flawed science.
This would avoid the totally irrational situations that the Food
Supplements Directive would otherwise create. For example, synthetically
produced selenium would have been allowed on the positive list,
while the natural source found in Brazil nuts would not; synthetic
forms of Vitamin E (often used in ‘adverse’ vitamin
studies reported in the media) would be allowed, but the natural,
most beneficial food forms would not.
An outstanding moment for the Alliance for Natural Health
The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) is a Europe-wide professional
organisation dedicated to ensuring that good science and good law
are applied to regulation affecting the leading edge of natural
health. If the Advocate General’s recommendations are endorsed
by the ECJ judges, it will represent the culmination of three years
dogged determination, dedication and hard work on the part of ANH
and its many supporters around the world.
‘It is commendable that the EU Advocate General has seen
through the flawed science and law of the Food Supplements Directive
and reached his recommendations today,’ said Dr. Robert Verkerk,
Executive Director of the ANH. ‘All that ANH is campaigning
and working cooperatively for is the right for consumers to have
access to safe natural healthcare and for legislation to be based
on good science and good law. This is a great day for the tens of
millions of people who believe passionately in the benefits of natural,
preventative healthcare.’
David C. Hinde, Solicitor and ANH Legal Director, added: ‘This
is a very significant Opinion in a landmark case. What we want to
see in the EU is the Food Supplements Directive doing the job for
which it was created which is to provide a “safe harbour”
for food supplements so that they are not classified as drugs, and
to promote their availability across the EU. Advocate General Geelhoed
is the most senior Advocate General at the ECJ and his considered
reasoning vindicates ANH’s legal analysis and position. We
are very optimistic that the Court will adopt his recommendations.’
Supporting safe supplements
ANH supports many aspects of the Directive, and firmly endorses
the banning of ingredients that are patently not safe, stating that
existing UK and EU food law already provides perfectly effective
protection from unsafe products getting onto the market. Furthermore,
ANH says that it is not scientifically rational to classify an ingredient
as being unsafe without taking dosage levels into account, something
that was not a condition of being admitted onto the positive list.
ANH believes that a far more appropriate system for banning any
substances that might pose a risk to health would be to produce
a ‘Negative list’ for ingredients where there was proper
evidence of lack of safety. The system proposed by the EU was going
to ban ingredients on the basis that companies did not have the
financial capacity to meet the high data threshold required for
the scientific dossiers demanded by EU authorities. In this way,
ingredients that have been part of the human diet for thousands
of years, and which are increasingly difficult to derive from conventional
foods, would be lost, and would not be able to be supplemented.
The future of the leading edge of natural health secured
Drawing its support European-wide from consumers, manufacturers,
retailers, practitioners and some of the leading experts in nutritional
medicine, ANH has taken on the Goliath of the European Commission
and those that support the unscientific and unlawful ban in the
Food Supplements Directive, to protect the interests of everyone
concerned with the leading-edge of food supplements and natural
healthcare.
‘None of the major EU countries felt the need to oppose our
application for a declaration that the ban on vitamins and minerals
in the Food Supplements Directive was unlawful,’ added Anthony
Haynes, Technical Director of Nutri-Link Ltd., a UK food supplements
company that brought the legal challenge jointly with ANH. ‘It’s
bizarre how this regulation got this far.’
A wide welcome across the industry if the ban is overturned
Greg Watts, Chief Executive of Ultralife, a manufacturer of leading-edge
food supplements, said: ‘This is very encouraging news. If
the ban came into force we would have to reformulate down to simpler,
more basic products that consumers and practitioners find are less
effective.’
Dr Damien Downing, a medical doctor and one of the UK’s leading
practitioners in nutritional medicine, said: ‘Practitioners
of nutritional therapy, and there are thousands of them in the UK,
largely use leading-edge food supplements. If these nutrient forms
remain, we can continue to treat our patients with meaningful solutions
and provide the products that we know are so beneficial. A ban would
in one fell swoop remove the vital tools of practitioners’
trade.’
Sara Novakovic, owner of Oliver’s Wholefood Store in Richmond,
Surrey, said: ‘At last it is now highly likely we can continue
to offer the products that our customers ask for and want, rather
than have to remove them all from the shelves for no good reason
and supply them with inferior quality alternatives.’
The end of the beginning
This is just the beginning for the Alliance for Natural Health.
Regulatory and industry pressure through the EU Food Supplements
Directive was always likely to translate globally, particularly
to the US, through Codex and the World Health Organisation. Without
having to justify any health hazard, and without considering any
benefits, safety has been used as a reason to restrict the availability
of natural food products.
‘Yet food supplements are the safest things that people put
into their mouths – considerably safer even than conventional
foods’, said Dr Robert Verkerk. ‘With rapidly declining
vitamin and mineral content in fruit vegetables and other foods,
and continuing increases in degenerative diseases such as heart
disease and cancer in the West, this has always been a very big
issue worth fighting for.’
‘Fundamentally, an amended Directive would help to slow down
the agenda of the Codex Alimentarius Commission to export worldwide
an onerous, EU-style regime for food supplements.’
David Hinde added. ‘The ANH is now going to be working on
getting a proper procedure in place for the Food Supplements Directive
and in addition, the next challenges will be on legislation proposing
to reduce dosages to ineffective levels, and to restrict other nutrient
forms such as amino acids, enzymes and plant nutrients. Traditional
herbal remedies are also under threat. In its work, the Alliance
for Natural Health will continue its thorough, professional approach
based, as always, on ‘good science, good law.’
ENDS
For enquiries and further information contact:
Alliance for Natural Health
www.alliance-natural-health.org
Dr Robert Verkerk, Executive Director
Tel. 01252 371 275
E-mail: robv@alliance-natural-health.org
David C. Hinde, Solicitor, Legal Director
Tel: 020 7738 1640
E-mail: davidh@alliance-natural-health.org
IKON Associates
(PR advisers to the Alliance for Natural Health)
Adrian Shaw
Tel: 01483 535102
Mobile: 0797 990 0733
E-mail: adrian@ikonassociates.com
Paul Donkersley
Tel: 01483 535101
Mobile: 0796 764 6046
E-mail: paul@ikonassociates.com
Notes for editors:
1. The Alliance for Natural Health is a Europe-wide association
of manufacturers, distributors, retailers, consumers and complementary
practitioners who have an interest in food supplements. More information,
including details of members, will be found at www.alliance-natural-health.org
Good science and good law underpin all of the ANH’s work,
and the scientific reports produced by the ANH are endorsed by many
of the world’s leading doctors and scientists working in the
field of nutrition.
2. If the ban on vitamins and minerals is implemented there is
much at stake:
· Over 5000 products will disappear from the shelves of
UK health stores as a result of the ban removing access to over
300 vitamin and mineral ingredients (out of a total of about 420).
These include, amongst others, the main natural forms of Vitamin
E, several forms of vitamin C, the key natural form of folic acid,
MSM and a range of minerals such as vanadium, silicon and boron,
all being products which millions of consumers choose to take as
part of their regular health regime and have done so without any
ill effects for many years.
· An individual’s freedom of choice to take safe natural
health products will be removed – 40% of the UK’s population
take vitamins and minerals.
· Products are to be banned with absolutely no scientific
justification. Many of the world’s leading scientific and
medical experts in nutrition support the absence of any proper basis
for the proposed bans.
· Although the proposed bans related only to vitamins and
minerals, unless overturned, the ‘Positive list’ system
will most likely be transferred to other nutrients used in food
supplements, such as plant extracts, amino acids and enzymes. The
precedent set by an ANH victory will drastically reduce the chance
of future bans on these other nutrient forms.
· Further legislative proposals by the EU are due to be
considered by the European Parliament later this and next year.
These include restrictions on maximum dosages of vitamins and minerals
and restrictions on health claims of foods. Again, the ANH is working
to help positively shape such legislation using its mantra of ‘good
science and good law’.
|